Lawsuit Against Federal Workplace Abortion Policy Moves Forward—What It Means for Employers & States

A federal appeals court has ruled that a lawsuit filed by 17 Republican-led states challenging Biden administration workplace rules on abortion accommodations can proceed. The 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a lower court’s decision, allowing the lawsuit to move forward.

The case focuses on workplace accommodations for employees recovering from abortion procedures, a provision included in the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act (PWFA) and enforced by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). The states argue that this policy oversteps federal authority and conflicts with state abortion laws.

What Is the Lawsuit About?

The lawsuit, originally filed in 2023, challenges how the EEOC is interpreting the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act (PWFA)—a bipartisan law passed in 2022 to ensure that pregnant employees receive reasonable accommodations in the workplace.

Why Are the States Suing?

• The EEOC’s guidance includes abortion as a qualifying medical condition under the PWFA, meaning employers must provide accommodations—such as time off—for employees recovering from an abortion.
• The 17 states, led by Tennessee and Arkansas, claim that the EEOC exceeded its authority by extending protections to abortion, arguing that Congress never explicitly intended the PWFA to cover abortion.
• Many of these states have strict abortion restrictions following the overturning of Roe v. Wade in 2022 and argue that the rule would force them to make accommodations conflicting with their laws.

Court’s Decision: Why the Lawsuit Can Move Forward

The 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the states have standing to challenge the EEOC’s rule because they are directly affected as employers.

• The court overturned a lower court’s dismissal of the case, which had previously ruled that the states lacked standing to sue.
• The court found that states have a valid concern over compliance costs and potential conflicts with their own employment policies.
• The ruling does not determine whether the EEOC’s abortion accommodations are legal—it simply allows the lawsuit to proceed.

Full Court Ruling: uscourts.gov

Impact on Employers & Workers

How the EEOC’s Rule Affects Employers

• Under the EEOC’s interpretation of the PWFA, employers must grant reasonable accommodations for employees recovering from an abortion, similar to accommodations for pregnancy or childbirth.
• The lawsuit argues that private businesses and state governments as employers could be forced to adjust workplace policies and provide leave or other benefits related to abortion procedures.

More on EEOC Workplace Guidelines: eeoc.gov

How the Lawsuit Could Change Workplace Policies

If the states win the lawsuit, the EEOC could be forced to rewrite its rules, potentially removing abortion from the list of protected medical conditions.
If the states lose, all employers—including those in states with strict abortion bans—will be required to comply with the EEOC’s guidelines.

Federal Employment Laws: dol.gov

Political & Legal Reactions

The case has sparked sharp political debate between Republican-led states and the Biden administration over federal vs. state authority on abortion-related laws.

Supporters of the Lawsuit (Republican States & Pro-Life Groups)

• Argue that the EEOC is unlawfully expanding federal power by forcing employers to accommodate abortions.
• Claim that Congress never explicitly approved abortion accommodations under the PWFA.
• Say the rule conflicts with state laws that restrict abortion.

Opponents of the Lawsuit (Biden Administration & Reproductive Rights Advocates)

• Defend the EEOC’s inclusion of abortion, arguing that abortion-related medical recovery is part of reproductive health.
• Say that denying workplace accommodations for abortion recovery is discriminatory.
• Warn that blocking the EEOC rule could harm workers who need leave for abortion-related medical issues.

What Happens Next?

Now that the lawsuit can proceed, it will likely move to a full trial or further appeals. The final decision could impact employment laws nationwide, particularly in states with abortion restrictions.

Possible Outcomes:

If the states win, the EEOC may be forced to remove abortion from its list of workplace accommodations.
If the Biden administration wins, employers in all states will have to comply with the abortion accommodation rule, regardless of local laws.
The case could eventually reach the Supreme Court, given its potential nationwide impact on workplace rights and abortion laws.

Supreme Court Docket Updates: supremecourt.gov

What This Means for Workers & Employers

For Employers:

• Businesses should review current policies to ensure compliance with both federal and state laws.
• Employers in Republican-led states may face uncertainty until the case is resolved.

For Workers:

• Employees should stay informed on how workplace policies might change based on state and federal court decisions.
• Those recovering from abortion procedures may still request accommodations, but legal challenges could affect their rights in certain states.

Final Thoughts: A Major Legal Battle Over Workplace & Abortion Rights

The lawsuit by 17 states challenging the EEOC’s abortion accommodations rule marks a new legal front in the ongoing abortion rights debate.

With federal workplace protections and state abortion restrictions now colliding, the case could set a major legal precedent for employer responsibilities, workers’ rights, and state sovereignty.

As the lawsuit moves forward, both employers and employees should monitor developments closely, as the final ruling could reshape workplace policies across the country.

For more information, visit eeoc.gov or scotusblog.com for Supreme Court updates.

This article has been carefully fact-checked by our editorial team to ensure accuracy and eliminate any misleading information. We are committed to maintaining the highest standards of integrity in our content.