High 5 Games, a leading developer of social casino games, has been ordered by a Washington state jury to pay $24.9 million in damages after being found in violation of the state’s gambling laws. The ruling is a landmark decision that could have significant implications for the broader social casino industry and major tech companies involved in facilitating these transactions.
Background of the Case
The lawsuit was filed in Washington state, where gambling laws strictly regulate real-money betting and games of chance. High 5 Games operates several social casino platforms, including High 5 Casino and High 5 Vegas, where players use virtual chips to play slot and table games. While these chips cannot be directly exchanged for real money, players can purchase additional chips to continue playing once they run out.
The plaintiffs argued that this system constituted illegal gambling under Washington state law. Specifically, the case cited the Recovery of Money Lost at Gambling Act (RCW 4.24.070) and the Washington Consumer Protection Act (RCW 19.86), which prohibit wagering money on games of chance outside regulated casinos. According to court documents, High 5 Games’ customers in Washington spent nearly $18 million on virtual chips while using its platform. (Washington State Legislature)
Court Ruling and Damages
In June 2024, U.S. District Judge Tiffany M. Cartwright ruled that High 5 Games’ business model violated Washington law. The court found that social casinos operate in a legal gray area where they mimic real gambling while avoiding regulation. The jury ultimately awarded $24.9 million in damages, which includes nearly $7 million in statutory damages on top of the money lost by Washington-based players.
This case is significant because it is one of the first class-action lawsuits against a social casino operator to go to trial instead of settling out of court. Previously, major social casino operators like Big Fish Games, Playtika, and DoubleDown Interactive have paid out over $650 million in settlements in similar cases.
Implications for the Social Casino Industry
The ruling against High 5 Games sets a strong legal precedent for future cases against social casino operators. Many legal experts believe this could lead to increased scrutiny of the industry and potential regulatory changes. The Washington State Gambling Commission (WSGC) has already been actively monitoring social casinos and their legal status in the state.
A major concern is the role of tech giants like Google, Apple, Meta, and Amazon, which facilitate in-app purchases for social casinos and take a percentage of every transaction. Attorneys representing the plaintiffs argue that these companies function as financial intermediaries and could face legal challenges similar to those brought against High 5 Games.
“This ruling could open the door for further litigation against tech companies that profit from social casinos,” said one legal expert involved in the case. “If Washington state laws apply to these platforms, companies like Apple and Google could be held accountable for allowing and profiting from illegal gambling.”
What This Means for Players?
For social casino players in Washington and other states, this lawsuit highlights the potential risks associated with virtual gambling platforms. Many players do not realize that spending money on virtual chips could be classified as gambling, even when there are no direct cash payouts.
Regulators are urging players to be cautious and understand the legal implications of playing social casino games. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has also warned consumers about the potential financial risks involved in digital gambling and microtransactions.
Potential Regulatory Changes
In light of this case, lawmakers in Washington and other states may push for stronger regulations on social casino operators. Some potential regulatory measures include:
- Stronger age verification: Ensuring that minors do not have access to social casino games.
- Spending limits: Implementing restrictions on the amount players can spend on virtual chips.
- Transparency requirements: Requiring companies to disclose how much money players spend and providing clearer refund policies.
- Tech company accountability: Expanding regulations to include platforms like Apple and Google that facilitate social casino purchases.
These potential measures could significantly alter the social casino industry and force companies to change their business models.
What’s Next for High 5 Games?
High 5 Games has not yet announced whether it plans to appeal the ruling. If the company does appeal, it could take months or even years before a final decision is reached. In the meantime, the ruling could encourage similar lawsuits in other states where social casinos operate.
For now, social casino operators and tech companies alike will be watching closely to see how this case influences future legal battles and regulatory policies.
Final Thoughts
The High 5 Games lawsuit marks a pivotal moment for the social casino industry. While the company must pay nearly $25 million in damages, the broader implications could be even more significant. If regulators and lawmakers continue to scrutinize social casinos, more companies could face lawsuits, stricter regulations, or even bans in certain states.
This article has been carefully fact-checked by our editorial team to ensure accuracy and eliminate any misleading information. We are committed to maintaining the highest standards of integrity in our content.
Premlata is a seasoned finance writer with a keen eye for unraveling complex global financial systems. From government benefits to energy rebates and recruitment trends, she empowers readers with actionable insights and clarity. When she’s not crafting impactful articles, you can find her sharing her expertise on LinkedIn or connecting via email at [email protected].