Which States Just Approved Lower Property Taxes?

In Tuesday’s election, several states tackled property tax reforms, with voters deciding on a range of ballot measures designed to lower or, in some cases, eliminate these taxes altogether. Here’s a breakdown of what happened across the country and the implications for homeowners and state budgets.

In North Dakota, voters decisively struck down a measure to eliminate property taxes entirely. If passed, this would have made North Dakota the first state in the U.S. without property taxes. However, the measure faced strong opposition, with 63% of voters rejecting it.

The proposal, while tempting for homeowners seeking relief from tax burdens, raised serious concerns about its financial feasibility. Eliminating property taxes would have cost the state government an estimated $1.3 billion annually, potentially crippling its ability to fund essential services such as schools, infrastructure, and public safety. To offset this shortfall, higher sales or income taxes might have been required—a prospect that likely swayed voters against the measure.

According to Realtor.com, the North Dakota property tax rate averages 0.97%, costing the typical homeowner around $2,700 annually. While property taxes can be a burden, they remain a critical revenue source for funding key government programs.

Florida voters approved Amendment 5 with 66% support. This measure will adjust the state’s homestead tax exemption for inflation, effectively reducing the taxable value of homes. This change will take effect on January 1 and is expected to provide meaningful relief to homeowners, especially as property values continue to rise.

In Georgia, voters passed an amendment aimed at limiting increases in the assessed value of homesteads. The measure, which garnered 63% support, will help mitigate the impact of rising property values on homeowners’ tax bills. This is seen as a win for homeowners seeking relief in a rapidly appreciating real estate market.

Both Colorado and New Mexico took steps to support disabled veterans by expanding property tax exemptions. These measures aim to provide financial relief to veterans and their families, recognizing the sacrifices they’ve made in service to the country.

In Arizona, votes are still being counted on a proposition that would provide property tax refunds to homeowners if public nuisance laws, such as those addressing homelessness, are not enforced. This measure reflects growing frustration among residents over local governance and its impact on property values and quality of life.

Illinois voters supported a non-binding advisory question advocating for a “millionaire tax.” This proposal would increase taxes on individuals earning over $1 million annually, with the additional revenue earmarked for property tax relief. However, implementing this plan would require an amendment to the state’s constitution, a process that is far from guaranteed.

While property taxes are often seen as burdensome, they serve a vital role in funding state and local services. Measures to reduce or eliminate these taxes must carefully consider how to replace lost revenue without compromising essential programs. The results of Tuesday’s elections highlight the diverse approaches states are taking to address this challenge, from targeted exemptions to broader structural changes.

For homeowners, these changes could mean significant financial relief, but the long-term impacts on state budgets and services remain to be seen. As property values continue to rise across the country, debates over property taxes are likely to remain a hot topic in future elections.

This article has been carefully fact-checked by our editorial team to ensure accuracy and eliminate any misleading information. We are committed to maintaining the highest standards of integrity in our content.